Saturday, November 12, 2016

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (NES)

Hey sorry about the lack of updates, but i forgot about this blog..........which little of you cared about it. Here's the game

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Developer & Publisher: Konami
Platform: Nintendo Entertainment System
Released: 1989

Story- The Story is a typical 8-Bit Story so it gets a 10%

Graphics- The game looks okay, the Turtles look fine and the rest are mixed- 50%

Sound- The Music is great, and the sound effects aren't too bad- 85%

Gameplay- The game play is decent, the characters control decently, overall its just fine, except for the difficulty- 65%

Quality- The quality of the game is typical NES Konami fare- 95%

Replayability- The replayability isn't high- 10%

Replacement- Nah- 0%

Overall Score- 70%
The Game is fucking hard but it sure isn't a bad game, its okay. We'll have to wait for...........wait what? I have to do the DOS version next?

Monday, June 20, 2016

Super Mario 64

Developer: Nintendo EAD
Publisher: Nintendo
System: Nintendo 64, DS

Mario 64 is well lets see.

Story- What did you expect in a Mario game- 5%

Graphics- The graphics are decent except for Bowser which is just utter shit and i don't like how Mario's eyes are too close- 85%

Sound- The music is great and Mario's voice is good- 90%

Gameplay- Most of the gameplay is great except for some missions and the camera sucks and Mario is stiff- 80%

Quality- Talk about quality here- 95%

Replayability- This game is just asking for it- 100%

Replacement- Yeah this is a good replacement for Bubsy 3D- 90%

Overall is 95% despite some flaws, its a great game.....until

DS Section

Story- Story is mostly the same except Yoshi has to save Mario, Luigi, and Wario for Mario to save peach- 10%

Graphics- Despite it looking jaggy the graphics are way better- 90%

Sound- The same- 90%

Gameplay- This is where sadly where i have to talk about the one problem, THE D-PAD, so now the controls SUCK, the Camera is way better but the controls are terrible so-20%

Quality- This game has the same good quality 95%

Replayability- Now the replayability is WAY BETTER- 100%

Replacement- I'm zig-zagged on the replacement factor, on one hand the camera and graphics are better, but on the other they fucked up the controls so i'll give it a 80%

Overall- 70% I hate what they did to the movement but the rest sorta make up for it so yeah

Bubsy 3D

Developer: Eidetic (SIE Bend Studio now)
Publisher: Accolade, Telstar
System: PlayStation 1, Sega Saturn, Sega 32X Grey means the game was cancelled on these platforms

Oh god, Bubsy 3D, developed by Eidetic as their first game ever, and published by Accolade in the US in 1996, and Telstar as their only game in 1997 for Europe, this game is infamous, IN-FA-MOUS, so what do i think of it, lets see.

Story- The story is that Bubsy must stop stupid aliens- 0%

Graphics- What the fuck am i looking at, what fuck-wits made the stupid mistake of this shit?- 0%

Sound- The sound is so goooooooood- 0%

Gameplay- 0%

Quality- What quality was this, i suppose that the game isn't broken completely just partially- 1%

Replayability- What replayability, The endings are both bad so it isn't even worth it- 0%

Replacement- .....No- 0%

And the overall score is 1%(replace the one with a middle finger) This game is complete shit and you should just throw it away, the only reason it gets a 1 is that glitches are somehow, SOMEHOW missing, and the game doesn't kill your PS1 so yeah.

Saturday, May 28, 2016

Sonic Runners Review

Developer: Sonic Team
Publisher: SEGA
System: iOS, Android.

Sonic Runners is another Sonic game in the fallen franchise so does this game succe.....i'm sorry but this game is the worst Sonic game ever and here's why.

Story-The story is alright, Knuckles isn't a stupid retard so that gives the score up to a 65% 0%

Graphics-The game looks alright, no problems on that, just average for a iOS/Android game- 60% 0%

Sound-The music is fine, not awful and the rest is typical so that gives it a 70% 0%

Gameplay- The gameplay is simple but fun.....until the free-to-play bullshit comes so that gives the game a 30% 0%

Quality- 0%

Replayability- Considering how broken this piece of shit is, how shit the free-to-play is its a 0%

Replacement- What do you think? 0%

And the SuperSkullz Review's overall score of ZERO This piece of shit is the WORST SONIC GAME EVER......IN FACT CHANGE ALL THE SCORES TO ZERO!

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3

Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision
System: Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PC

The Call of Duty Series releases a game every year though i think you know this already so lets cut to my review

Call of Duty Black Ops 3 is Treyarch's return to the series after Black Ops 2. So expect that with this game, So we can get to the game and give each a rating

Story-The game's story has good writing despite it being somewhat simple- 89%
Update- Oh and a update, the writing is actually mediocre and the story rips-off 2 games before this including Black Ops 1 so that makes a minus 20% for a writing of  69%

Graphics-The graphics are uninspired but looks pretty good- 76%

Sound-The music is good, and anything else is decent at worst- 80%
Update 2- The Sound is mediocre at worst- 70%

Gameplay- The gameplay is the same old Call of Duty game since the 1st one- 45%

Quality- The game has some sloppy technical problems but it's alright- 78%

Replay-ability- This is where the game is the most played, the multiplayer where online gaming is where this game shines- 80%

Replacement- Sadly, since this is almost a year after the game came out, this game mostly is going to be in storage- 5%

And the overall score is 50%, the game is mediocre and the problem with the Call of Duty games is that you expect the same thing......and it really isn't that fun anymore